Fax

Me too

Not allowed to

Cant because its a inderect free kick

@@Chase_Was_Taken the pass you donkey how's he gonna score with the bottom of his boot

363 likes and no replies? I'll fix that

@@0trulsame

57 likes? nah let me change that

P

Handball is indirect... This is the keepers' version of handball.

sent off? definitely yes, but not a penalty

this certain foul is never punished by a red card

yes, I believe that's the correct call.

Not on this one rule

Under law, a goalkeeper can never be sent off for handling the ball inside his own box

Technically he didn’t cause he had a massive wall beside him

Truly a sus moment

Yg

sussy moment indeed

Same I thought the ref was having a laugh at first

@@Koolgamer-pt4rb lmao

Referee should have given a clear for it because it obviiusly was a diffcult to handle. I think the rule was mis interpret and leanancy could be in use here.

Bro what? his teamate passed it back and the keeper used his hand that's an indirect free kick

@@monkeyatanofficedesk9253 man referee can use discretion here to not act to the exact ruling. Thi was not deliberate but unintentional. I remember when the rule came to existance. The goalie was allowed to make a safe in cases like this

Can't use hands

a goalkeeper is forbidden to handle the ball when passed to them by a team-mate

Ayo 😳😳😳😳 that sus

Brodies a football😭😭💀

Goalies are not allowed to use their hands when a team mates passes the ball to them., It is a foul. But since it is not a personal foul inside the box against an opponent, it can not be a penalty, so it is an indirect free kick.

@@franciscoenciso435 thanks

nah he passed it first

@@PoliceRawCam oh yeah my bad

It is a indirect freekick if a teamate passes to his goalie and then the goalie takes it directly with his hand it is a indirect freekick ,it' maximum reach is the goal line

A back pass is a back pass. It doesn't matter if it's going in or not.

@@dunkindeeznutz referee can and should have used leanancy to allowed this situation. The rule is mean to cut out antiplay timesaving and this was obviously not to get goals from backpasses. Referee can and always must use his own onservation

No, he cant use his hands for that. Learn the rules before you talk

Still thats not allowed

No

You can't use your hands at all directly from a back-pass

The keeper is not allowed handle the ball from a pass of his teammates. These types of freekicks are called "Indirect Freekicks" and it's a rule. Learn your stuff.

Why? He didn't pick the ball up so not a back pass and he had to save it as it was a goal threat I can't understand how the ref even gave the free???

@@pauliboi9976 because he fouled aha, that’s why he gave the free kick. You can’t handle the ball in any way from a back pass

- No foul on anyone was committed. - it is an _indirect_ freekick in this case; ball must touch someone else after initial kick before crossing goal line (a penalty is a [direct] freekick) - rules made in 90s say that a keeper cannot use his hands to touch/hold a ball in his area when ball is intentionally passed to him by teamate.

Wrong, chech the rules mate . If a keeper touches it with his hand from a back pass intentionally is a indirect free kick

It isn''t to do with picking it up. You can't touch a back-pass with your hand at all

I think it’s only a red if it’s outside the box

Back pass to the keeper, the keeper can not use his hands on a back pass, so an indirect free kick is given.

@@dunkindeeznutz thank you for answering and not saying, "YoU dOnT wAtCh FuTbOl?!?!?" i also had the same question. Much love

Why?

Best league? The same team has won 11 years in a row

No

golf watcher

He don't have to pick the ball up if he handles it's a indirect free kick where he handles it

The d?

Rule is like that for Gk, not penalty

Why would it be a penalty?

Probably because the goalkeeper touch the ball using his hand. As far as I know you cannot do that if your teammate pass it to you. But I am not sure myself. I am not following this sport

Yes